Hot off the presses comes the 'shocking' revelation that the nineteen year old actor who plays Harry Potter lost his cherry to an 'older' woman - at the age of sixteen. Gosh, I might have to go and have a lie down. To be frank, the only thing that shocks me is how come this child managed to turn into a stud muffin whilst I wasn't looking. Magic, I guess.
He hints that she was shockingly older than him to make the whole thing a bit more prurient. So she was 18? 20? or 69? (not!) There is such a trend for people revealing stuff about their sex lives in order to get magazine articles covered in the rest of the media. Look at Nick Clegg and his 72 virgins or whatever!
Posted by: Josa Young | September 04, 2008 at 02:09 PM
I bet you are right, 'Details' must be delighted. But all power to Dan Radcliffe for choosing an older partner, his subsequent girlfriends would presumably reap the benefit!
Posted by: The Virginity Project | September 05, 2008 at 12:23 PM
I must congratulate him. what an achievement. but why should this be posted on web?
What does this prove? Does it mean anyone that reads this has to get influenced or start comparing himself/herself to do the same stuff at a young age?
I dont think these sort of articles make any positive influence on readers.
So please be sure to keep a check on quality of the messages shown and the message they convey.
Posted by: vamsi | September 06, 2008 at 08:39 AM